women are increasingly recognized as part of the emancipation of more rights and benefits. "Advantages?" Will ask the interested reader now. "Women have been disadvantaged by the nature, we compensate for it now. Because we still do not about all the same right? "Something like that would be the typical reaction. Let's look at the issue more closely to determine whether this argument is justified.
First of all, the tolerable theme of "all men are equal "or" all men are created equal by their Creator to be "clarified. With "like" is not equality, understood in the sense of uniformity, but the equality of rights. If all men are created equal by their Creator, it means that he used in the creation of all people the same way and made no exceptions. With its creation, all people are equal. You did not receive legal benefits of their birth. "Equal" always refers to the equality.
When I say "Anna should have more rights than man Benny, for she is a woman" I say in an abstract way: "A has more rights than B because A is a member of X." This abstraction could also form the following facts: "Adolf has more rights than Benjamin, for Adolf is an Aryan." I am well clear that the minority of the Aryans, except the American Indian tribe of the same name does not exist. Similarly, there are no minority woman or man, or black, or homosexual.
Homo Sapiens Sapiens, modern man broken down into many subgroups. It is divided according to biological characteristics such as race, gender, age, and even weight and muscle mass, according to social Factors such as merit or class in which he was born, with whom he has sexual intercourse, as he believes in what god or gods and how he or she worships. This is just an excerpt, but these are all properties.
If we assign people minorities because they have certain characteristics that we atomize society. First, limits on women, then single women, then homosexual single mothers, etc. A society which is increasingly fragmented only of lonely souls.
There are no minorities, only individuals with features. Instead to isolate herself because of the differences of these properties and split into smaller subgroups, we must recognize that we all have something in common: we are human. As human beings we are individuals. Even identical twins are never so that we can speak of an exact copy.
is if in old documents and writings of talk about equality, it's always about that all men are created equal. We get our rights because we are not black or white, or green, Muslim or Jew, are heterosexual or gay. We get our rights because we are human.
additional groups of people if we Grant rights just because they all have a certain characteristic in common, that means all other people discriminate. Thinking in groups of collectivism, and that is only the smiling visage of racism. If we accept instead that all men are equally blessed with the right to life, liberty and pursuit of happiness, then we give everyone the same law, a fact of life and his fortune to find. If we recognize each person as a unique individual, then racism will disappear from the earth.
The correct answer to the question from the beginning is: "If you want that all are equal, you will not need any" cons " balance, because we are already all the same. You have to do only one thing. Recognizing that we are all equal "
