The end of the wage labor A central point of the Liberals, Social Democrats and Socialists will probably never understand that the state is never productive. Social benefits come about only through the redistribution of capital from the productive sector in the unproductive sector. But what our business is about? Is it about creating jobs? Nothing is easier: hole heap up - fill in holes. No, the purpose of all economic activity is productive and that more and more with less and less use of labor and Raw materials. The goal of all economic activity is wealth without work. Consequently, this development is even the stated goal of the Socialists, to create working towards.
What should you do? Well, we humans are terrible experience is to go against nature and their ways. Whether it's building to be built extra strong to withstand wind and earthquake machines or the work place explosive implosive. Now, instead of against the will of the economy to create wealth without work, to work, one should question what the work place today is so vital in our society with the economic principles of fundamental is fought. It is the reward. People strive for work, at least in the first instance, at the wage as their livelihood. But if it were provided for the livelihood, people would go to work? Would the people working on the creation of pure joy?
goes to work The will of the people out, at least for more than 90% of the wage. If it had provided for my livelihood, would go to work more than 90% but still a significant proportion would reorient professional. This is consistent with surveys of the revelations that a considerable proportion of the working population in Germany is not satisfied with their jobs.
combination of the tax system would be a radical change a system that covers possible for every citizen of Germany, regardless of age, an income that provides the basic human needs. Through this system could now immensely more pressing issues are resolved in pleasure. If we think away all taxes and we assume we have a consumption tax of 33%. This would, such as VAT are today, be added to the prices and paid by the companies. VAT is in itself a very anti-social control because the poorer citizens have a relatively high proportion of consumption to income and therefore have a higher tax burden, while the wealthier citizens a relatively small proportion of their income spend on consumption. Now, suppose you the proceeds of this consumption tax share by the number of all citizens in Germany and throw it at the beginning of the next month as a tax deduction in the form of an unconditional basic income that would have all citizens, whether unemployed or poor revenue that to cover their basic expenses sufficient . First verkonsumieren citizens more than they begin to receive basic income to pay taxes. And citizens with a higher consumption share it many be as many but the basic income for their living but not enough for a nice car or a house is. But if the wealth in society is growing so with such a system will benefit all and not just the richest.
Let's look again at the federal budget. For 2009 plans, the Federal Ministry of Labour and Social Expenditure in the amount € 123.5 billion. It is the expenditure on social benefits by SGB I, II & III, pension payments, etc. All these services would be rendered superfluous by a basic income. A pension which is higher than the basic income can be emancipated only to work periods work out a private pension. € 123.5 billion could be saved this year! Of course, the revenue lost by the state of the 19% and 7% VAT. expected to be received.
working which I am begenet in connection with the issue of utilization of social security systems by illegal and legal immigration, the deterioration of such a basic income by immigration or local origination of "loafers" is. In many expositions of the concept of unconditional basic income, I came across fixed amounts like 600 € or 1200 € per month. I think of such fixed amounts nothing that they turn off self-regulatory system. If the "lazy rate" increase in the country, reduced the basic income. The gravitational effect of the idlers is down and the brain drain or the work will increase, productivity and consumer spending to grow again and thus the basic income. It is therefore not a beggar's gift as HartzIV but for a share of the profits of the productive economy, Germany.
An additional important aspect is the way the basic income is concluded. This fact is the fundamental difference to social redistribution systems such as those apparent in SGB. While these are collected from the taxes on the income honestly acquired the productive sector, the share of income from the consumption of all citizens will be financed. While there is, can escape at least not by legal means, the taxes on their work, it's everyone's freedom to decide how much they want to consume and therefore dissipate how many taxes he wants. No one is in a direct way taken anything but each is given.
Any modern economy will have to deal with the issue of separation of wage and work. The earlier this happens the better, because every nation of the rapid development of rationalization-related unemployment is ignored in future, have an immensely widening gap of poverty and wealth. The first tender excesses Entwicklugn this are already visible. Such a social climate creates the perfect breeding ground for extremist ideas and leaders. And where the geführ us that can read in every history book ...
