Today: 75% of Germans do not know what plagiarism is
This is one of the possible interpretations of the constant highs survey by Dr. AD Baron Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg and from. Who would be surprised even if the quality of government conditioning equipment? Obviously, but the media seem not to be able to identify which dimension has plagiarism, because the comparisons made there go from cheating to copyright infringement. When one casts a in a school exam on the leaf of the neighbor to try their hand at general knowledge that one should have actually learned, this is not comparable to a thesis which is actually a , its contribution to research in the relevant field. Nor is downloading the latest movie from Michael Bay rubbish plagiarize, at least as long as one does not claim to have him home-made.
Another explanation of the already questionable popularity of Mr. Guttenberg is the lack of awareness among the people for the concept of honor. A nation that has such low standards of honorable action that deceive a federal minister may, without fear of having to be brought to justice, it deserves cheated, lied to and robbed to be.
I would sorry the first thing that it took too long to finish the second part has. But I'm sure the other parts are simple and may be published therefore faster to me. But it was the correct construction of the legislature so immensely important part of a free constitution is that it must be done with proper care. However, I'm sure I've forgotten something, and this or that can be done better.
Note: There were changes in the meantime I am part! So I recommend to study this before.
Part II [The Legislative Power]
Article 10 [legislative body] The institutions of the legislature are the Bundestag and the Bundesrat.
Article 11 [Composition of the Bundestag] (1) The Bundestag is composed of five hundred fifty-five Members which are determined directly by the people of the Covenant in free, equal, secret and direct suffrage. (2) can make a choice in who reached the age of twenty-five years, at least ten years, the citizenship of the Federal Republic of Germany has held at least two years and resides in the constituency in which he is standing for election. (3) The duration of the mandate of a deputy is four years. (4) Each deputy must serve a maximum of three terms.
Article 12 [failure be a member of the Bundestag] (1) If a Member of the Bundestag must fail its mandate promptly by a special election reassigned. (2) This authorization is effective only until the next regular election.
Article 13 [Election of the Bundestag] (1) The Bundestag is entitled to choose who, aged eighteen years and citizenship of the Federal Republic of Germany has held. (2) Every citizen has a voice with which he determined a candidate from his constituency. (3) The three candidates with the most votes won, members of the Bundestag. (4) The weighting of the votes allocated to a Member of the Bundestag, the sum of its component Voters. (5) The federal government leads by three years after entry into force of the Constitution by every ten years thereafter, a census of the population, and entirely devoted to establishing the number of voting citizens and their place of residence. (6) The election districts are divided on the federal government so that the population represented by each deputy is approximately equal.
Article 14 [President of the Bundestag] The Bundestag elects the beginning of the legislature from among its speakers to the Bundestag president.
Article 15 [First Federal] (1) prior to the first term, but after the election of the first Federal Parliament, elected under this Constitution, the election is limited to two hundred seventy-eight members drawn by lot to two years. (2) The election for the first parliament, according to this Constitution shall, exactly one year after implementation of the Constitution and then just every other year.
:
{Comment The consequence is that every two years half of the credentials-negotiable} Article 16 [Independence of deputies] (1) No Member of the Bundestag may simultaneously hold another term of office or office or in salary depending on a other posts. (2) Each deputy receives from the federal treasury an expense allowance of an appropriate size. (3) changes the level of compensation will only enter into force for a mandate when it was newly assigned by choice.
{Comment: Preventing this is occurring the elected representatives, judges in their own right if it determines the level of the diets decide}
Article 17 [impeachment] the Bundestag can with a three-quarters majority for the impeachment of the Chancellor and / or his ministers . tune
Article 18 [Composition of the Bundesrat] (1) The Bundesrat is made up of council members, which are determined by the governments of the provinces and approved by the parliaments of the Länder. (2) each state will be five council members seconded. (3) may be appointed to the Federal Council member who attained the age of thirty-five years, at least fifteen years a citizen of the Federal Republic of Germany has held at least five years in the State is resident. (4) The term of office of the Federal Council member is three years. (5) A Council member may serve a maximum of 2 terms. (6) Each Council member has one vote in the Bundesrat.
Article 19 [Federal Council President / Vice Chancellor] (1) At the beginning of term of the Chancellor, elect the members of the Federal Council from among their number a spokesperson for the Federal President and Vice-Chancellor. (2) This represents the Chancellor in his absence.
Article 20 [Independence of Board member] (1) No member of the Council may not simultaneously hold another mandate or are in the wage function of another. (2) Each council member receives from the federal treasury an expense allowance of an appropriate size. (3) changes in the level of compensation will only enter into force for a Federal seat when it was occupied by a new Council member.
Article 21 [legislative initiative] (1) Each member of the Bundestag and Bundesrat is always authorized to introduce a bill. (2) Every citizen of the nation is authorized to introduce a bill, if it support can boast a number of Germans with their signature corresponding to at least the number of people are representing on average by a member of the Bundestag.
{Explanation:
555 seats / 3 MP = 185 constituencies
~ 62.200.00 voters (in 2009) / 185 constituencies = 333 000 people = 1 electoral district
111 000 = number of citizens represented by one delegate = Mindestunterschiftenanzahl petition for}
Article 22 [Legislation] (1) Any proposed legislation must be by the Bundestag and Bundesrat with at least two-thirds majority be accepted. (2) a bill to amend the Constitution has the effect, it must be adopted by a three-fourths majority in the Bundestag, the Federal Council and by the people. (3) The total or partial release of the federal power, like some sort of institutions that are not part of the state, requires a constitutional amendment.
Article 23 [Competencies of the Federation] The federal government has legislative jurisdiction over: first relations with foreign countries; second nationality, freedom of movement, immigration and emigration and extradition; third the federal defense; 4th care for veterans and surviving dependents; 5th the foreign trade and trade between the states; 6th the weights and measures; 7th the road transport sector, where it is the states borders on exciting roads of general traffic or for the federal defense; (amended 12/02/2011) 8th maritime, offshore and coastal fisheries 9th Aviation 10th the space
Article 24 [Fundamental Rights] Independent of the authorization of the federal government through the states of the federal government does not enact legislation which: first violate the dignity of man; second restrict freedom of thought and opinion and expression thereof; third the law change in public restrict rooms to peaceful assembly; 4th the exercise of religious practices and customs that harm any third party directly restrict; 5th the establishment of civil associations that do not serve the stated aim to harm third parties directly restrict; 6th the right to own and bear arms and use to protect their own lives and limit property; 7th Civil commitment for military service; 8th Citizen-soldiers or commit to accommodate other members of the alliance against his will with him; 9th the search or surveillance of a citizen without allowing sufficient reason to suspect; 10th the seizure or control of property of a citizen without sufficient reason to believe, without explicitly stating the location and / or article of monitoring or allow searches; {K.: This figure of course included accounts, hard drives, web space} 11th the restriction of freedom of a citizen without allowing public hearing, and adjudication by his fellow citizens; 12th a public or private institution with a monopoly on money creation or coinage grants.
Disclaimer: The opinions of this video do not necessarily reflect my opinions. The content of the video features Mike Shanklin responsible. The translation is done by me.
Many people today have trouble to understand how society works. Although they detect that something was wrong, even if they do not understand the root cause of these problems well. The reason for this is that it is often difficult to grasp something that the opposite is our education and conditioning. In some cases, individuals hold firmly to the political system to create in the great hope of a better system. The question we must ask is: "What is this system? Which enable and support these people?
The answer? Statism.
The definition of statism from Merriam Webster. "Concentration of economic control and planning in the hands of a highly centralized government, often with ownership of industry by the government" statism is a philosophy, a political movement describes what the state uses to achieve goals. Statism is political domination and control and the belief that the state can achieve any goal that he feels are necessary.
I personally can not remember that anyone ever said to me: "Hey Mike, those damn Homeless "or" I want an unsafe neighborhood. "Or" I want to dirty toilets. "Or" I want to rampant drug abuse, " I'm not sure if this has been tested empirically, but I'm pretty sure that most people want to help the homeless, heal the sick, feed the hungry, care for the elderly, create peace and prosperity. But the question that is forgotten is, "How will these be achieved through statism" - A system of political domination and control and the belief that any goal can be achieved by the State
The State by scarcely any resources from customs, compared with the free market, which we, by the way, now do not have. The state has no independent source of income - it is not supplied themselves So, where do politicians get the money to achieve these goals? If the pathological, parasitic bureaucrats, whom we call politicians need money they need to extort the population. These beautiful people sign documents, laws that make it sound as if their actions are morally justifiable. They hire men to steal for them and make it is as if the job is heroic. It is, of course, is not a voluntary funding. You do not have the possibility to choose whether to participate in this pyramid scheme or not. The more laws, the more you have to pay.
If you break one of the tens of thousands arbitrarily invented protectionist trade regulations, to set you in a fine.
a penalty. Just as Al Capone.
If you refuse to pay this penalty, the threat to refuse to submit to, they send their paid mercenaries to kidnap you and keep you in a cage. This again requires more tax theft to cover the costs. In these cages, the guards tortured the prisoners, unnecessary. If you try to protect your family and to defend against interference, you will executed like pigs to the slaughter.
After the smoke has died down, several things become clear. Every law in the statist society ... is a weapon. Every law is a threat of the use of force and weapons are everywhere. We now see things as they really are. Control of theft, prohibition and crime without victims are street wars, lobbying is bribery, protectionism regulations are for the benefit of corporations, war is murder, terrorism is statism, statism is slavery.
It's not as if the state could feed each child. No one pays social security contributions because he is pleased with the results. You give what you have, because you would not go to jail. Why? Everyone would give the money to better a private charitable foundation as the state - as private as anything in a statist system can ever be - because they know that their money will be used much more effectively than through the bureaucratic black hole of the state. As children we were
we have been taught anyone to beat, not to steal, to respect others. Great principles should be followed more frequently. However, when we grow up, things seem to change.
statism.
See What most adults today, as reality is nothing more than hitting, pushing, Stealing, kicking, screaming, threats, and, well ... you know what I mean.
Many people believe that just because the state sets up persistent monopolies in certain industries, it should be so. The altruism is at work here either - what more could not be farther from the truth. Although the days of the Enlightenment and industrialization have scrapped most of the traditional taboos, many people still believe in magic powers and magic. They believe that if only enough people want something that would be true, then it is true. They believe that the signatures of politicians have magical powers that go far beyond all others. Who are these people still depend on such a Voodoo? There are no wizards, witches and sorcerers. Unfortunately, many of them politicians, the oligarchs, bureaucrats, kings, senators, presidents ... and voters. They believe that just because you're a law called "social security law," it creates social security. They believe that the signing of a document can stop the hunger, can stop the law decrees that homelessness or drug addiction, stop the pages and pages of parchment or oligarchs can protect the unborn. They never see the weapon with which they are aimed at everyone, including himself
When abortion clinics do not want to co-finance, go to jail. If you do not want the peaceful people are arrested because they carry with them the wrong plants, they are arrested. If you pay the torture did not want to throw you in a cage. If you do not pay unnecessary and inhumane wars overseas do you go to jail.
Begin to recognize in what a farm, you were born? believe a farm on which most of the housemates government alchemy to be killed in their own narcissism can.
The truth: There is no magic! Politicians have no magical signatures, no magic wands. Only weapons, and men to enforce their will. In many cases, they act without thinking about those ever they authorize. There is no difference between statism and a bat. They both have the same goals and make use of the same methods. Use coercion to achieve both what they want.
The Non-Aggression Principle teaches that people should have the right to do whatever they want as long as they violate the rights of others not so. Where there is no victim, there is no crime. Statism is nothing more than the undermining of the rights of a negative minority by the majority.
Most people think anarchy is chaos, even if I find anything chaotic as a megalomaniac guide is defined by political weaklings. If I were you take the right to decide what to eat every day, would you hurry your "food anarchy" calls back. Oh, I know it sounds scary. How can we trust the people just decide to which they satisfy their hunger? I think they see: That's just stupid. People who want to have anarchy, the same goals as those who support the statism. They want peace and prosperity. The difference? You will want to retain control over their own lives rather than their responsibilities in a violent and tyrannical system to unload.
The statism is an outdated system that we inherited from the cavemen. Let us briefly at the time of slavery, only one hundred and seventy years ago now. It's not as if slavery could be reformed. Could you imagine slavery advocate for less? Of course not! They would demand the complete abolition of slavery.
The statism is slavery and statism must be abolished completely. If the system is once you see this as what it is, there is a virtuous man ... no way back.
Comment: Shanklin describes perfectly the perversion of the statist System, which is the reason why I post his video here and I have translated. I agree with Shanklin solution of anarchy, but from various reasons not agree that I will explain in more detail elsewhere. The alternative to the belief that government can solve every problem is certainly not the government can not solve any problem and should be. As so often is good and right in the middle ...
Hello my friends, I have indeed written to twoheartsonepassion it here first will be a bit quiet but I was now but the blogging packed. I've hardly reported, the I know I'm sorry. I did not have so the desire to blog but I have it now, yes.
So what are special to tell? The moving date is set! On Feb 25, I finally pull my darling away from RLP after BAYERN (!
On March 7, I have a job interview and, yes, I finally am 18
That was really too short and just the latest of me. Oh yet from what I've been 2 months & a Deviantartaccount now finally uploaded images. To the account you comes here, I would be super happy about being monitored, and new Comments! :) I also link at the top of the bar
For conclusion, also a picture today I was with my brother in the Cologne Zoo giraffes and yes yes I think everyone is familiar. On twoheartsonepassion I also have a small collage and the rest of the zoo, of course, pictures Created: Deviantart
As might be expected, our politically correct pundits once again on the demonizing of a direct democratic Decision in Switzerland. This time it's about something which is particularly bizarre for them: private gun ownership. Switzerland has a militia army, once in practice, although the U.S. commitment clear in its constitution to Militia.
Calls Who of private gun ownership should be abolished in the drive the same reasons as those which demand the death penalty: The right to life come from the state, and because this is so, only the state can defend withdraw it or .
The truth is that every individual has the inalienable right to his life. This right may neither the state nor by the people be withdrawn. If this is attempted, there is a right of resistance, and therefore can not be resisted, has the right to own a gun and carry. The weapon in the hands of a free people symbolizes freedom. And if free people find themselves together in order to defend themselves against a threat, they defend their collective rights to life and form a militia.
right to complain, not without reason, that's too much of the funding in the fight against enemies of the constitution the right hand of enemies of the constitution left. Links demands more money for the fight against any law the middle and condemned the extremism clause as "Stasi" method. "About Fidelity to the Constitution?" In the fight for the constitution?
Is it really the government's job to convey an opinion, to suppress the other? Is it not much more life, liberty and property protected? If an opinion directly attacking one of these goods, for example by inciting a crowd, has a right to intervene, for the protection of goods of the One, for example, freedom of opinion, should not be to the detriment of another. That while the State provides funds available which are then used the legal rights of a Restrict citizen is not only a disproportionate restriction of freedom of speech but also an incredibly dangerous tool in the hands of an executive - Parts and heersche.
We need a freeze on all programs aimed at controlling public opinion and not a "war law" and not "extremism" clause.
While the Egyptian people finally rose against Mubarak come, like the first attempts of Western and Middle Eastern countries in the internal affairs Egypt interfere. Will invite Israel, obviously not ganzselbstlos that Mubarak should be further supported by the West and to this end the government sends a charge equal weapons. The International Socialists sent by the UN with the backing of the banking cartel, Mohammed El Baradei on the grid, so he steals the Egyptians their revolution.
As a people through free association with each other will decide who is part of the people, it also decides on who it is ready to be governed. Thomas Paine said: "A government, even the best part is no longer as a necessary evil, the worst is intolerable." The Egyptians have turned against their government, a the worst was collected. But the state is its citizens always a wolf, and it takes a nation of lions, not lambs to hit him in irons.
Now is the time for Egyptians to forge their own destiny, or all the other global players, sheep lead to the same, leave.
